Strictly against “Man Is a Pest”We vehemently disagree with this. Any direction that views man as a pest will be completely incapable of developing solutions for the survival of mankind.Much worse, groups that view humans as pests will fight quite vehemently against anything that might prolong humanity's existence. For this, let's consider the protests against the Tesla factory in Grünheide. Tesla's mission statement is “to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy”. What is there to protest about? What was there about electric cars before Tesla? From the corner of the environmentalists came at that time the City-El. A vehicle with 3 wheels for one person and about 80 km range and 65 km/h top speed. This electric vehicle found very few buyers.
CityEl at the Wels energy saving fair 2006
This is what is meant by “being incapable of developing solutions for the survival of mankind”. The shift from the internal combustion engine to electric mobility is a very important problem. Tesla has been fundamental to solving this problem. Elon Musk has a very positive attitude towards humanity.
On the other hand, those who are under the influence of the pest philosophy will not be able to develop solutions, that's where something like a City El comes out. Just like the motto “We have developed a super problem solution, but the evil bad people have not accepted it”.
It is the perfect expression of “saving restricting renouncing”, because one does not want to concede more to the pest human being.
The difference between a CityEl and a Tesla is obvious, here is the difference between different energy transitions.
Whereas we call back to 350 ppm as a target, it says so in the mission statement: planetary cleanup back to 350 ppm CO2, we contribute house by house. That is several times the net zero emissions target. How is that supposed to be possible when we are already in danger of failing at the much smaller target? Imagine it's a cold December day in Norway. You have a choice:
| |||||||||||||||










